You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Linear and logistic regressions betweenn geographic region and eating disorder symptomology

From: Mapping eating disorders in adolescents and young adults: an investigation of geographic distribution and access to care in Ontario, Canada

 

EDE-Q Global Score

EDE-Q Clinical Risk (EDE-Q > 2.48)

 

B (95% CI)

p

R2

OR (95% CI)

p

Geographic Region

  

0.175

  

Intercept

1.34 (0.21, 2.47)

0.021

 

0.23 (0.04, 1.46)

0.121

Ref: Highest Urban

     

Mainly rural

0.52 (0.20, 0.84)

0.001

 

1.81 (1.09, 3.01)

0.021

Mainly Urban

-0.02 (-0.21, 0.17)

0.843

 

0.96 (0.71, 1.30)

0.795

Sparsely urban-rural Mix

0.07 (-0.21, 0.34)

0.629

 

0.99 (0.64, 1.55)

0.992

Public Health Unit

  

0.177

  

Intercept

0.96 (-0.19,2.10)

0.102

 

0.12 (0.02, 0.82)

0.030

Ref: Toronto

     

Central

0.46 (0.22, 0.70)

< 0.001

 

2.06 (1.40, 3.06)

< 0.001

East

0.27 (0.04, 0.51)

0.024

 

1.39 (0.95, 2.05)

0.091

North

0.21 (-0.24,0.68)

0.362

 

0.94 (0.42, 2.01)

0.874

West

0.20 (-0.04, 0.45)

0.100

 

1.34 (0.91, 2.00)

0.142

  1. Note Each column represented the abbreviated outputs of 2 regression models with geographic region and Public Health as the independent variables and EDE-Q global score and EDE-Q Clinical Risk as the dependent variables
  2. Values in bold are significant with p < 0.05
  3. a Analyses adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, gender, sexual identity, income, and highest level of education completed
  4. EDE-Q = Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; B = Coefficient from linear regression; OR = Odds Ratio from logistic regression; CI = Confidence interval
Back to article page

Journal of Eating Disorders

ISSN: 2050-2974