You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Moderation analyses for stigma-related perceptions

From: Invisible walls? Stigma-related perceptions are associated with reduced help-seeking intentions for disordered eating in men

Relationship

Model statistics

Path statistics

F

df1, df2

p

b

SE

p

95% CI [LL, UL]

EDE-Q

16.71

3, 128

< 0.001**

    

 X → Y

   

0.53

0.08

< 0.001**

0.39; 0.68

 W → Y

   

− 0.37

0.22

0.091

− 0.78; 0.02

 X*W → Y

   

− 0.34

0.17

0.040*

− 0.66; − 0.02

MDDI

6.51

3, 128

< 0.001**

    

 X → Y

   

0.05

0.01

< 0.001**

0.03; 0.08

 W → Y

   

− 0.65

0.29

0.026*

− 1.22; − 0.13

 X*W → Y

   

− 0.01

0.02

0.561

− 0.05; 0.04

DOS

3.38

3, 128

0.020*

    

 X → Y

   

0.07

0.02

0.009*

0.03; 0.12

 W → Y

   

− 0.49

0.25

0.053

− 1.00; − 0.02

 X*W → Y

   

− 0.03

0.05

0.567

− 0.13; 0.07

EDY-Q

1.03

3, 114

0.382

    

 X → Y

   

0.02

0.12

0.844

− 0.23; 0.24

 W → Y

   

− 0.50

0.30

0.119

− 1.13; 0.06

 X*W → Y

   

− 0.18

0.40

0.681

− 0.97; 0.65

  1. Values were computed with PROCESS version 4.2 model 1 using bootstrapping procedure with 5000 iterations, heteroscedasticity correction (HC3), and mean centering of predictor and moderator variables. X = respective symptom severity as independent variable; Y = intention to seek help as dependent variable; W = mean score of stigma-related perceptions of eating disorders in men items as moderator. EDE-Q = Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire; MDDI = Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory; DOS = Duesseldorf Orthorexia Scale; EDY-Q = Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire; CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit
  2. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01