You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Within-condition differences compared to baseline values (in %)

From: Can bioelectrical impedance analysis be used to identify water loading in patients with anorexia nervosa?– Implications from experimental measurements in young, healthy, and normal weight women

 

Intervention

Control

 

Δt1-t0

Δt2-t0

Δt3-t0

Δt1-t0

Δt2-t0

Δt3-t0

Body mass (kg)

1.7 ± 0.2

1.7 ± 0.2

1.6 ± 0.2

0.0 ± 0.1

-0.1 ± 0.1

-0.1 ± 0.1

FM (kg)

6.6 ± 3.0

3.6 ± 3.5

2.4 ± 3.8

-0.2 ± 3.2

-0.4 ± 3.0

0.3 ± 3.2

FFM (kg)

0.2 ± 0.8

1.2 ± 1.0

1.5 ± 1.1

0.0 ± 0.9

0.1 ± 0.9

-0.2 ± 0.9

SMM (kg)

-0.4 ± 1.3

0.2 ± 1.7

0.4 ± 1.9

0.3 ± 1.8

0.5 ± 1.6

-0.1 ± 1.7

TBW (kg)

-0.3 ± 0.9

0.5 ± 1.2

0.8 ± 1.3

0.1 ± 1.3

0.2 ± 1.1

-0.3 ± 1.2

ECW (kg)

-0.4 ± 0.8

0.3 ± 1.0

0.7 ± 1.0

-0.1 ± 1.0

-0.2 ± 1.1

-0.7 ± 1.1

ECW/TBW (%)

-0.1 ± 0.6

-0.2 ± 0.7

-0.1 ± 0.9

-0.2 ± 0.8

-0.4 ± 0.9

-0.3 ± 0.9

PhA (°)

0.9 ± 1.4

1.8 ± 1.6

1.9 ± 2.1

0.2 ± 1.8

0.6 ± 2.2

0.6 ± 2.3

  1. ECW, extracellular water; FFM, fat free mass; FM, fat mass; PhA, phase angle; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; TBW, total body water